A blog on social software, collaboration, trust, security, privacy, and internet tools by Christopher Allen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baa0f/baa0f9e328a0fa199d5fd8ae9792ba383beb9a7b" alt=""
In my post about the Dunbar Number I offered some evidence on the levels of satisfaction of various group sizes based on some empirical data from online games. There I was able to show that even though the Dunbar Number might predict a mean group size of 150 for humans, that in fact for non-survival oriented groups the mean was significantly less, probably between 60 to 90.
I also offered a second hypothesis, that there is a dip in satisfaction level of groups at around the size of 15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4890/f4890dd41c9506ec797ac35dd8e659ca0d163ff6" alt=""
Lately I've been noticing the spread of a meme regarding "Dunbar's Number" of 150 that I believe is misunderstanding of his ideas.
The Science of Dunbar's Number Dunbar is an anthropologist at the University College of London, who wrote a paper on Co-Evolution Of Neocortex Size, Group Size And Language In Humans where he hypothesizes:
... there is a cognitive limit to the number of individuals with whom any one person can maintain stable relationships, that this limit is a direct function of relative neocortex size, and that this in turn limits group size .