A blog on social software, collaboration, trust, security, privacy, and internet tools by Christopher Allen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2196/f21964b60048748767f596e08263578433db9399" alt=""
My colleague, Shannon Appelcline, has been working on a game rating system for RPGnet. This has resulted in real-world application of the principles for designing rating systems which we've previously discussed in our Collective Choice articles. Shannon's newest article, Ratings, Who Do You Trust? offers a look at weighting ratings based on reliability.
On the RPGnet Gaming Index we've put this all together to form a tree of weighted ratings that answer the question, who do you trust?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4890/f4890dd41c9506ec797ac35dd8e659ca0d163ff6" alt=""
Lately I've been noticing the spread of a meme regarding "Dunbar's Number" of 150 that I believe is misunderstanding of his ideas.
The Science of Dunbar's Number Dunbar is an anthropologist at the University College of London, who wrote a paper on Co-Evolution Of Neocortex Size, Group Size And Language In Humans where he hypothesizes:
... there is a cognitive limit to the number of individuals with whom any one person can maintain stable relationships, that this limit is a direct function of relative neocortex size, and that this in turn limits group size .